Industry · Government

AI consulting for Australian government — DTA-aligned, audit-ready.

AI work for federal, state and local government — engagements that pass DTA scrutiny, satisfy procurement, and produce systems an APS team can actually run.

AI work for Australian government is shaped by a specific combination: explicit policy (the DTA AI in Government Policy, the Australian Government AI Assurance Framework, the Voluntary AI Safety Standard), real procurement constraints (BuyICT, Digital Marketplace, department-specific panels), and the documentation overhead that comes with any APS engagement. We design AI engagements that respect those constraints from day one — including writing every recommendation in language that survives a Senate Estimates question.

Regulatory context

The AU obligations every Government engagement maps to.

Every AI engagement we run in Government produces documentation that explicitly maps the work to the obligations below. The risk register, the control framework, the board pack — they reference these by name, so internal audit and compliance teams can adopt the artefacts directly without translation.

Key challenges

What makes AI in Government different.

DTA AI Assurance Framework alignment

The framework is the published expectation, not just a reference. Engagements that don't map cleanly to the framework get queried at internal review. We make the mapping explicit in every deliverable.

Procurement realities (panel pre-qualification + scope)

Most APS AI engagements run through a panel arrangement. We engage either directly via BuyICT or Digital Marketplace, or as a sub-consultant to a larger panel partner where that's the right vehicle. The procurement path is decided before scope, not after.

ISM + PSPF compatibility

Security classifications and the Information Security Manual dictate which AI architectures are feasible. We design with the security posture in mind from the architecture stage — including private-cloud and on-premise deployment options where the use case requires.

Briefing-ready outputs

Government AI work produces a different artefact than commercial AI work: not a deck, a briefing note. We write deliverables in plain-English briefing format that survives the COG / departmental review process unmodified.

Use cases

Where AI most reliably earns its keep in Government.

Citizen-service assistants (frontline)

LLM-assisted intake, eligibility assessment, policy navigation for service-delivery agencies. Human-in-the-loop, audit-trailed, accessible.

Policy + regulation analysis

RAG over policy + legislation + case-law corpora. Particularly transformative for departments dealing with high-volume FOI, ministerial briefing, or interpretation work.

Internal-staff productivity tools

Document drafting, summarisation, search across departmental knowledge bases. The lowest-risk, highest-leverage starting point for most APS AI initiatives.

AI governance + risk frameworks

For agencies setting up their internal AI governance posture. Aligned to the AU Government AI Assurance Framework + the Voluntary AI Safety Standard.

Services most relevant here

Practice areas with strongest Government engagement experience.

FAQ

Common questions about Government engagements.

Can you handle classified or restricted-environment work?

Our cleared-personnel capability and restricted-environment experience is discussed during engagement scoping. Specific arrangements and personnel details aren't appropriate to publish on a marketing site.

How do you align AI engagements to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard?

Every APS AI engagement we run maps explicitly to the Voluntary AI Safety Standard's 10 guardrails plus the AU Government AI Assurance Framework. The mapping is part of the standard delivery documentation.

Next step

Talk to a senior partner about your Government situation.

We’ll come ready with questions specific to your industry and your regulator environment. 30 minutes, conversational, no commitment.